Table of Contents
Table of Contents

109.66

The current reading of the Investopedia Anxiety Index is above neutral, indicating a higher level of anxiety.

Markets Today

After the S&P 500 posted its worst first half of the year since 1970, U.S. stock futures are starting the new month and new quarter under pressure.

All three major U.S. stock indexes finished the month and the second quarter in negative territory yesterday, as the S&P 500 lost 0.9%, while the Nasdaq dropped 1.3%, and the Dow fell 0.8%. For the month, the S&P 500 fell 8.4%, the Nasdaq declined 8.7%, and the Dow lost 6.7%. 

It was the largest first half percentage drop ever for the Nasdaq, while the Dow plunged the most since 1962. For the first half of 2022, the S&P 500 fell 20.6%, the Nasdaq lost 29.5%, and the Dow declined 15.3%. All three indexes posted their second straight quarterly declines. The last time that happened was in 2015 for the S&P 500 and the Dow, and 2016 for the Nasdaq. For the quarter, the S&P 500 declined 16.4%, the Nasdaq lost 22.4%, and the Dow fell 11.2%. 

Treasury yields slid for the third straight day following soft consumer spending and elevated inflation data. The yield on the 10-year Treasury is back below 3% at 2.97%.

Oil prices tumbled as OPEC and its allies confirmed it would only increase production in August as much as previously announced, despite tight global supplies. Light sweet crude is now at $107 per barrel.

Bitcoin posted its worst quarter since 2011, and its worst month ever. Today, it is trading back above $19,000, while Ether is above $1,000.

Overseas, the Stoxx Europe was flat after data showed inflation in the eurozone hit a record as the European Central Bank prepares to raise interest rates for the first time in 11 years. In Asia, major indexes closed lower. Japan’s Nikkei 225 closed down 1.7%, while South Korea’s KOSPI fell 1.2%. The Shanghai Composite edged 0.3% lower, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index was closed for a holiday.

Later this morning, the Institute for Supply Management is expected to report its index of national factory activity likely fell to a reading of 54.9 in June, from 56.1 in May. S&P Global’s Manufacturing PMI data is also scheduled for release. The Commerce Department is expected to report on construction spending, which likely rose 0.4%.

What the Index Shows

The Investopedia Anxiety Index (IAI) is a gauge of investor sentiment based on the behavior of tens of millions of Investopedia readers around the world. A reading of 100 is considered "neutral."

The IAI is driven by reader interest on Investopedia across three categories of topics: macroeconomic (such as inflation and deflation), negative market sentiment (such as short selling and volatility), and debt/credit (such as default, solvency, and bankruptcy).

Background on the Index

In 2012, Seth Steven-Davidowitz published an article in The New York Times explaining how he used Google search results to uncover voter bias that pollsters were unable to find. As of March 2022, Investopedia has over 44 million monthly unique visitors, and with Steven-Davidowitz's work in mind, we asked ourselves, “What can the search behavior of our readers tell us about the state of markets and the economy?"

We have the data: more than 30,000 URLs of quality content going back before the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the 2008 financial crisis. I represented the editorial team and partnered with our lead data scientist Dr. Ronnie Jansson at the end of 2015 to search for patterns in our most highly trafficked materials. We carefully selected a selection of terms on topics that suggested investor fear, like "default," and opportunistic terms, like "short-selling."

Finding a signal in noisy web traffic data is difficult due the varied seasonality of our readership (for instance, traffic declines on the weekends) and exogenous factors like search engine results page (SERP) rank. We first needed to develop a methodology to remove this noise and produce an index that robustly tracks the actual ebb and flow of interest in the chosen topics.

When we looked at the results of the analysis the first time, we found that the major peaks in the index occurred exactly where they would make sense: around major events like the fall of Lehman Brothers (by far the most significant peak), the Greek debt crisis, and the U.S. credit downgrade by Standard and Poor’s.

In the final version of the IAI we used 12 definition pages, all with exceptionally high page view counts. We also now use several thousand more pages in the normalization procedure. In total we used close to one billion page views to produce the 10+ year monthly IAI plot.

We had set out to create a proxy or index for investor sentiment, but we needed an outside point of reference. The Chicago Board of Options Exchange’s Volatility Index (VIX), often referred to as "the fear index," is commonly used as a gauge of investor fear. We plotted the VIX next to our new creation, and the results spoke for themselves:

Investopedia Anxiety Index plotted against the VIX.

Over a period of almost a decade, the large scale features are very similar in the VIX and the IAI despite measuring different phenomena (stock market volatility and content consumption, respectively). It gets even more interesting when the two are overlaid on top of one another:

Investopedia Anxiety Index plotted plotted against the VIX.

Perhaps the most compelling comparison is at the very earliest point of the plot. For more than a year prior to the peak of the financial crisis in September 2008, the IAI was profoundly elevated (around 120 or so – a level that had not occurred in a single month in the most recent four years), while the VIX remained subdued, around 20. In other words, based on the VIX alone you would be caught completely off guard by the biggest financial crisis of our generation, whereas the IAI was an alarm blaring for more than a year before the crisis hit.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. The New York Times. "How Racist Are We? Ask Google."

  2. The New York Times. "Seth Stephens-Davidowitz."

  3. Chicago Board of Options Exchange (CBOE). "Volatility Indexes."

Compare Accounts
×
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.
Provider
Name
Description